Re: omc-boats-digest V1 #131

From: Eric Graczkowski <ericg@...>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:30:30 -0600

Does that "hull weight" include only the basic boat and none of the gear,
engine, etc?
Eric
Oshkosh, WI
1966 Sportsman 150
----- Original Message -----
From: "jim orfino" <jorfino@...>
To: <omc-boats@...>
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: omc-boats-digest V1 #131

> I have an old March 1964 Popular Science Magazine test on the Sweet 16. It
> said the hull weighed 810 lbs and was rated for 130 hp max. It also listed
> for (f.o.b. Milwaukee): $1,650
>
>
> jim
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <bill.parkinson@...>
> To: <omc-boats@...>
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 7:54 AM
> Subject: Re: omc-boats-digest V1 #131
>
>
> > Great response Mike!
> >
> > FYI... I also have 1965 Sweet 16 and I do not think I have any damage to
> the foam.. floor is very solid, etc.... There is allot of foam down
> there.... you could probably chop the boat up into sveral pieces and it
> would still float... which is a good thing...I do wonder however if there
is
> any water down there.... do you have any idea how much our boats should
> weigh? I would think if there is allot of water down there the boat would
be
> much heavier.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tuesday, 29 July 2014 EDT