Re: [omc-boats] Seeking replacement prop

From: David <odin@...>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:20:59 -0500

Glenn, I have always opted to stay away from SST's - too hard on the
springs for the electric shift - and I am sure you know how hard it is
to find springs. Dave

Glenn Halweg wrote:

> Hello Scott, I don't have a 14 X16 for sale but your comment about not
> wanting a SST gave me pause. Do you feel a heavier prop causes
> driveshaft problems? I have a stainless 14X15 I was thinking of
> putting on my Rogue. It currently has a 14X14 aluminum prop. Glenn
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott E. Veazie
> To: omc-boats@...
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 10:20 PM
> Subject: [omc-boats] Seeking replacement prop
> I took the boat out today and discovered the river level
> was lower than last time, and unfortunatly chipped my
> favorite prop up. It still works pretty well, but I will
> most likely demote it to back up status since it's all
> chipped on the edges from the rocks. It was a Michigan PR
> 122, 14 x 16. Anyone have a good 14 x 16 they'd like to
> sell, Michigan or OMC? I really don't like using the 14 x
> 18 I have, one of the blades is a little off, and I lose
> alot of top end. The Seasport was supposed to have this
> prop, but my 14 x 16 does really great. I'm not looking for
> a SST, I'd rather bust a prop than a drive shaft.
> Thanks!! ~Scott
>

-----
To get off this list send mail to omc-boats-unsubscribe@...
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tuesday, 29 July 2014 EDT